Killer Legends (2014) Reviews

• Killer Legends: Thoroughly enjoyable documentary

  Platypuschow2018-12-19

  I came across this quite by accident mistaking it for something else, I am however very happy I did. This feature length documentary looks at four urban legends and their origins, where did they come from and did they start with an element of truth? Those that are looked at are the babysitter killer, the hook man, tainted Halloween candy and the killer clown phenomenon and all are very engrossing. Sadly with some they do digress somewhat and only look into a story that vaguely resembles it, but the stories are so well told and presented I really couldn't care less. I've never seen anything by Joshua Zeman, his methods appeal to me and I'll be actively seeking out more of his work now. The subject matter is certainly grim, crime scene photos and grisly descriptions don't help matters but if you can stomach it this is an interesting and enjoyable piece. The Good: Very well made Extremely engaging Likeable hosts The Bad: Some of the stories do digress from the source material Could have been a tad longer Things I Learnt From This Documentary: Be not afraid of the story, be afraid of the storyteller I find a weird appeal in all things clown I always thought the tainted Halloween candy might have been a Christian ploy to keep people away from the Pagan holiday that is Hallows Eve

• My god, this is dreadful! (very mild spoilers)

  butaneggbert2015-05-30

  Man, I wanted this to be good. The study of urban legends is so fascinating, and the right approach would dig into all their social underpinnings and (the point of this movie, apparently) how they might have evolved from true-life events. But this ego-driven mess (I won't call it a "documentary", which would dishonor the craft) isn't really about urban legends. It's about two wanna-be sociologists throwing every horror movie trope they can think of onto the screen. Eerie lighting: check. Contrived, faux-spontaneous conversations: check. Heavy-handed, non-professional narration: check. "Oh oh the monster is creeping up!" music under EVERY scene: check. Meanwhile they do their best to look like serious researchers, but the avalanche of illogical leaps and unsubstantiated conclusions keeps giving them away. It's only mockable up to a point, then it turns truly ugly. When you're going to linger on explicit photographs of actual torture and murder victims, respect is essential. But because this is merely the cartoon of an "investigation", these shots come off as lascivious exploitation. I feel for any family members who come upon this movie. Unwatchable. I turned it off.

• An Excellent Documentary Experience

  Necroambulant2015-05-12

  I decided that I needed to watch the Killer Legends documentary tonight. This was a serendipitous choice, it seems, since I just recently watched the meta sequel to The Town That Dreaded Sundown (sharing the same title), considering that this documentary begins with an exploration into that particular series of murders in Texarkana. It goes on from there to a chilling story of a real life incident of a child dying on Halloween night from poisoned candy as well as the basis for the urban legends that provide the substrate for numerous movies including When a Stranger Calls. This was a terrific documentary about a truly fascinating subject...and I wish that I had thought to do it myself. It would be an absolutely captivating thing to do with my time, traveling around and investigating the horrifying real life crimes that have birthed the numerous urban legends we grow up hearing and sharing with others.

• This review contains only a spoiler that warns and does not ruin plot

  areadingwoman2015-04-09

  Poorly marketed! Mostly because (Netflix at least) did the marketing as a horror documentary. NOT SO! In fact, The most horrific thing about this was the real life crime photos (some massively disturbing of recently raped teens complete with legs spread) that they insisted on showing regularly. Unlike the Jack the Ripper photos, these were not blurry and while they weren't blood and guts material, I could have lived the rest of my life without seeing a photo or a raped and strangled 15-year-old in the pose her attacker left her in. The movie bills itself as "getting to the bottom" of the real crimes that inspired urban legends. As a lover of urban legends, this seemed right up my alley. What it really turned out to be was about 5 minutes of facts stretched into 20 minutes segments that involve the following contrived, poorly done techniques: * knocking on doors in the neighborhoods of the crimes and telling people the true story of their street only to cause fear in 80 year old women who are retired and happened to be at home *Lots of shots of people driving around pretending they are talking about something that hasn't been scripted but clearly has been based on the 0 reaction of the other party these people clearly aren't actors but were forced to give an attempt) *Countless lines of empty dialogue that ends in exclamation points (a la Amittyville Horror - novel form) but actually says literally nothing *More shots of people walking and having contrived dialogue that adds nothing to the plot (think, "this could be the tree where she was killed" uttered in a FOREST full of trees) * A "researcher" on cast who is supposed to validate what's being said but is clearly a grad student who is being paid to waltz about in inappropriate clothing (for the task - who wears heels and/or wedges to traipse about the woods?) *Starbucks marketing to the MAX. Now, they may love Starbucks, and that's okay. I drink Starbucks myself. But I have to wonder why it's in EVERY shot while they are in the car. The saving grace is that they don't drag the logoed cups out into the woods. (The stunning part of woods walking was reserved for the heels.) *Ridiculous timing. Am I supposed to be scared because they chose to "investigate" the forest where murders happened at night? Do they think I'm really dumb enough to wonder why they didn't go in the daytime when they could see instead of going to Starbucks? Anyone mounting a genuine investigation would do so in the freaking daylight. * LOTS of conjecture. In fact, only one of the four segments shown actually had a clear cut end. Now, I know urban legends are legends for a reason. But a film that professes it will get to the bottom of the true crimes behind the legends better damn well deliver SOME facts at least. Nope. Not here. The only firm facts delivered were in those of the case where the killer was executed for his crimes. But even then it's obviously not clear since he died professing his innocence (but at least they had the forethought to pause the footage of interviews with him on shots that made him look crazy because he was mid-word or mid-smile. Who looks sane in that pose?). The best thing is actually the montage of horror movie clips that show how the urban legends developed in pop culture. Which really means that the best parts of the film are ones that the film makers didn't actually make. The only positive I can think of is that one of the four segments was on a crime (the babysitter one) that took place in Columbia Missouri - a town not far from me. So that was the only thing that kept me watching past segment 2. In fact, I had already reached for the remote to stop it when I heard the phrase "Columbia, MO" and so continued watching. At that point, though, I had already dug out the trusty laptop to mess around on. I didn't watch hardly any of segment four, but at that point I figured I was already invested and so might as well continue (and that investment might have been really to the website I had started shopping on by that point).

• Disappointing In The Same Way Cropsey Was

  TheFilmGuy12014-08-12

  Just like the directors other documentary, Cropsey, I found myself interested in the concept, but it really just let me down. It has a few little interesting moments, such as the clown segment, but overall it doesn't give a whole lot of information that you couldn't find online yourself with a little bit of research. The film explores the concept of how certain urban legends come from real crimes that actually happened. In theory this sounds good, but it ends up kind of covering what we could already assume. It also covers some stories that have already been covered before, such as the case of the poison pixie stick a kid ate on Halloween. It would have been more interesting to hear about urban legends that came from surprising real events. I think Cropsey did the same thing. It was a documentary that had a good concept but just kinda goes into territory that is less relevant and becomes boring. It also seems ridiculous how the filmmakers try to "solve" these crimes themselves, as if they are going to find something that the tons of people who investigated it before them, including police and other interested people. I just knew that they wouldn't discover anything new or shocking. I do wish this had more to offer, but it ends up being a forgettable documentary. I mean, if you really are interested in it, check it out, but if you know a little bit about urban legends, you might not get anything new from this.